Philosodialogue

Center for self propelled discussion, critique and dialogue in philosophy of music education (and related issues...)

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Calling on Students in Random Order

Once a month, our principal gives us a copy of the publication called "Better Teaching." I often skim through quickly, but in the December issue, there is an article under "Teaching Tips" called "Call on students in random order." See the article below:

You ask a question. A few hands--the same hands--go up. Research shows you're letting other students off the hook. If students don't think they'll be called on , they can let a class (or two) slide by. Pretty soon, they're falling behind.

The solution? Call on students in random order. Here's how:
-Put all names in a basket (or write them on wooden sticks).
-Pull names out randomly.
-Return the names so no one is ever "off the hook."
-Consider giving students one "free pass" for a question they simply can't answer.

One teacher created a computer program to randomly generate names. Later, she conducted research on student behavior. She learned that students:
-Showed up for classes more prepared.
-Paid more attention to what the teacher was saying.
-Did their homework.

In other words, they did all the things that led to success in class.
________
Source: "Bias-Busting Tech Keeps Students Focused," eSchool News, www.eschoolnews.com.

_______
What do you all think about this? I tend not to call on students who do not raise their hands because I worry about my students' fearing me or my class (think Parker Palmer).
I also find it problematic that this article does not address any pedagogical tools the teacher may use when presenting information or engaging with the students and material in class. I would be interested to see the research that "shows [I'm] letting other students off the hook."

1 Comments:

At 11:39 PM, Blogger Alex said...

I'm so glad you posted this!

I'm in secondary practicum now, and my co-op uses name sticks. They are popsicle sticks with the students names on them that she keeps a tin can. There is a can for each period.

Our first week there, she encouraged us to use them. We weren't comfortable with the idea of the name sticks because it seems like a cop-out. Using the name sticks means you don't have to wait while students process your question, think of an answer, and then decide to volunteer an answer. It's much easier to put them on the spot and make them feel bad if they don't know the answer right away. (I'm being sarcastic, in case you weren't sure.)

Though we dislike them, we use them because our co-op wants us to and the students are used to them.

I just feel like the name sticks are not only a cop out, but that they also don't encourage students to come up with a well-thought out answer. If we don't use them, it is true that only the same kids raise their hands right away, but if we wait, someone else will raise their hand and volunteer an answer.

I greatly dislike the name stick. That's my personal feeling, though.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home